May, 2010. The actual manuscript
July 15, 2010. Reviews by the referees
Referee 1 thinks that the paper does not prove its claims, and is unhappy about 'exceedingly poor' reference list. The review by Referee 2 is a single line.
July 15, 2010. Editorial decision
Just a formal rejection letter from Marco Genovese. I am struggling to understand Dr. Genovese's reasoning behind accepting the review by Referee 2.
July 15, 2010. My response to the editor
I address the arguments of the Referee 1, and appeal to Dr. Genovese to have a closer look at the referee's reports.